0.4 C
New York
Monday, February 10, 2025

Troy Minerals Experiences Analytical Outcomes from Desk Mountain Silica Challenge, Figuring out Broad Excessive-Purity Zones


Troy Minerals Inc. (“Troy” or the “Firm”) (CSE:TROY)(OTCQB:TROYF)(FSE:VJ3) is happy to announce that it has obtained outcomes from a sampling and mapping program on its 100% owned Desk Mountain Silica Challenge, positioned close to Golden, British Columbia, Canada.

Key Highlights

  • Three distinct zones of high-purity silica mineralization recognized inside the Mount Wilson Quartzite Formation.
  • 98.86% SiOâ‚‚ over a complete of 62.11 metres of channel sampling in 5 channels on the most important Desk Mountain Zone.
  • Outcrop sampling returned 98.18% to 99.74% SiO2 from 45 samples at Desk Mountain Zone, 97.83% to 99.49% SiOâ‚‚ from 13 samples at South Zone, and 95.82% to 99.82% SiOâ‚‚ from 29 samples at Southeast Zone. *
  • Very low deleterious components recognized in all samples.

President of Troy Minerals Inc., Yannis Tsitos commented: “These complete maiden assay outcomes validate the potential of Desk Mountain as a key high-purity silica asset. Sampling confirmed the distinctive high quality and consistency of silica mineralization throughout the Challenge. With grades reaching 98 to 99% SiOâ‚‚ throughout a number of zones of intensive outcrop publicity, and sampling starting from 98.18% to 99.74% SiOâ‚‚ on the most important Desk Mountain Zone, we’re quickly advancing our understanding of this strategic asset. The Challenge’s infrastructure benefits and proximity to present silica operations additional improve its potential as we work to determine Troy as a major participant within the North American high-purity silica market, positioning the Firm for long-term development.”

The sampling program consisted of each systematic seize samples and channel samples, with a complete of 110 seize samples (107 outcrop and three float) taken inside the property space and 70 channel samples collected from 62.11 metres inside 74.16 metres of channels.

Determine 1. Index Map

Outcrop Sampling Outcomes
Three most important areas returned vital high-purity silica outcomes: the Desk Mountain Zone, positioned on the north finish of the Property, the South Zone, and the Southeast Zone.

Essentially the most extensively sampled zone was the Desk Mountain Zone, which returned a mean grade of 98.90% SiO₂ from 45 seize samples (42 outcrop, 3 float), with values starting from 98.18% to 99.74% SiO₂. Moreover, from these samples the next common values have been returned: 0.31% Fe₂O₃, 0.01% CaO, 0.14% Al₂O₃, 0.02% MgO, 0.01% TiO₂, 0.01% P₂O₅, and 14ppm boron. See Determine 2 and Desk 1. *

Determine 2. Desk Mountain Zone Outcrop Sampling – %SiO2

Desk 1. Desk Mountain Zone Outcrop Samples

Pattern #

Easting (m)

Northing (m)

SiO2 (%)

Al2O3 (%)

CaO (%)

Fe2O3 (%)

MgO (%)

P2O5 (%)

TiO2 (%)

B (ppm)

299516

509114

5685249

99.41

0.11

0.02

0.39

0.01

<0.01

<0.01

6

299517

509193

5685166

98.84

0.14

0.01

0.23

0.02

<0.01

<0.01

8

299518

509314

5685171

99.20

0.10

0.01

0.25

0.02

<0.01

0.01

10

299519

509350

5685151

98.26

0.12

0.01

0.35

0.01

<0.01

0.01

15

299520

509369

5685129

99.20

0.13

0.01

0.21

<0.01

<0.01

0.03

16

299521

509395

5685107

99.17

0.15

0.01

0.27

0.02

<0.01

0.01

8

299522

509418

5685094

98.78

0.23

0.02

0.26

0.01

<0.01

0.01

12

299523

509442

5685075

98.59

0.14

0.02

0.26

<0.01

0.01

0.01

12

299524

509450

5685043

99.74

0.07

0.01

0.30

0.01

0.01

0.01

6

299525

509471

5685019

98.58

0.04

0.01

0.36

0.01

0.01

0.01

7

299526

509482

5684990

99.25

0.14

0.02

0.27

0.04

0.01

0.01

7

299527

509500

5684961

99.66

0.16

0.02

0.31

0.02

0.01

0.01

7

299528

509515

5684938

99.21

0.14

0.01

0.32

0.02

0.01

0.01

7

299529

509538

5684911

99.13

0.11

0.01

0.27

0.03

0.01

0.01

21

299530

509561

5684862

98.18

0.25

0.01

0.31

0.03

0.01

0.01

7

299531

509598

5684823

98.93

0.27

0.02

0.36

0.03

0.01

0.01

7

299532

509583

5684759

98.99

0.09

0.01

0.30

<0.01

0.01

0.01

7

299533

509619

5684743

98.72

0.16

0.01

0.35

0.02

0.01

0.01

14

299534

509641

5684726

98.18

0.30

0.01

0.33

0.04

0.01

0.02

15

299535

509712

5684697

99.41

0.13

0.01

0.30

0.02

0.01

0.01

7

299536

509736

5684685

99.27

0.11

0.01

0.33

0.02

0.01

0.01

7

299537

509764

5684670

98.58

0.13

0.02

0.36

0.03

0.01

0.02

8

299548

509306

5685510

99.32

0.14

0.01

0.29

0.01

0.01

0.01

18

299560

509476

5685127

98.99

0.13

0.01

0.32

0.03

0.01

0.02

27

299561

509472

5685107

99.01

0.05

0.01

0.32

0.01

0.01

<0.01

18

299562

509457

5685115

98.74

0.15

0.01

0.26

0.01

0.01

0.02

28

299563

509439

5685112

98.35

0.20

0.02

0.34

0.02

0.01

0.01

27

299564

509459

5685092

99.20

0.09

0.01

0.32

<0.01

0.01

0.01

21

299565

509487

5685107

99.49

0.09

0.01

0.28

0.03

0.01

0.02

28

299566

509490

5685083

98.48

0.25

0.02

0.35

0.01

0.01

0.01

26

299567

509503

5685071

99.03

0.11

0.02

0.34

0.02

0.01

<0.01

21

299568

509477

5685067

99.16

0.10

0.01

0.30

<0.01

0.01

<0.01

18

299569

509478

5685044

98.68

0.10

0.01

0.32

0.03

0.01

<0.01

20

299570

509506

5685041

98.46

0.43

0.02

0.32

0.06

0.01

0.01

29

299571

509523

5685054

98.81

0.13

0.01

0.31

0.03

0.01

0.01

22

299572

509382

5685160

98.42

0.09

0.01

0.29

0.01

0.01

0.01

23

299573

509397

5685160

98.92

0.11

0.01

0.36

<0.01

0.01

<0.01

18

299574

509406

5685142

99.12

0.09

0.01

0.30

0.02

0.01

<0.01

17

299575

509409

5685120

98.56

0.14

0.01

0.37

<0.01

0.01

<0.01

21

299581

509357

5685172

98.84

0.08

0.02

0.32

<0.01

0.01

0.01

18

299582

509429

5685142

98.87

0.15

0.01

0.29

<0.01

0.01

0.02

8

299583

509446

5685146

98.25

0.33

0.02

0.33

0.03

0.01

0.03

17

299584

509455

5685145

99.49

0.11

0.02

0.27

<0.01

0.01

0.01

5

299585

509473

5685142

98.66

0.08

0.01

0.36

<0.01

0.01

<0.01

6

299586

509493

5685133

98.52

0.05

0.01

0.29

<0.01

0.01

<0.01

<5

Word: 299548, 299584, and 299585 are float samples taken close to outcrop.

The South Zone, comprising 13 high-grade quartzite outcrop seize samples averaged 98.80% SiO₂ with values starting from 97.83% to 99.49% SiO₂. These samples averaged 0.28% Fe₂O₃, 0.13% CaO, 0.13% Al₂O₃, 0.02% MgO, <0.01% TiO₂, 0.02% P₂O₅, and 6ppm boron. See Determine 3 and Desk 2. *

Determine 3. South Zone Outcrop Sampling – %SiO2

Desk 2. South Zone Outcrop Samples

Pattern #

Easting (m)

Northing (m)

SiO2 (%)

Al2O3 (%)

CaO (%)

Fe2O3 (%)

MgO (%)

P2O5 (%)

TiO2 (%)

B (ppm)

248351

511603

5682006

98.60

0.28

0.08

0.25

0.04

0.01

0.01

15

248352

511563

5681948

99.45

0.15

0.02

0.22

0.02

0.01

<0.01

6

248353

511552

5681948

99.01

0.19

0.03

0.29

0.04

0.01

0.01

9

248354

511551

5681951

99.09

0.11

0.02

0.22

0.03

0.01

0.01

6

248355

511530

5681940

98.74

0.09

0.02

0.23

<0.01

0.01

<0.01

6

248356

511522

5681942

98.82

0.08

0.01

0.31

<0.01

0.01

<0.01

<5

248357

511512

5681951

98.31

0.09

0.01

0.24

0.01

0.01

0.01

5

248358

511485

5681948

98.14

0.13

0.28

0.32

0.03

0.01

0.01

8

248359

511461

5681935

99.49

0.11

0.02

0.30

0.02

0.01

<0.01

10

248360

511436

5681932

99.06

0.03

0.05

0.25

0.01

0.02

<0.01

5

248361

511444

5681918

99.42

0.07

0.01

0.29

0.02

0.01

<0.01

6

248362

511440

5681942

97.83

0.32

0.73

0.36

0.03

0.03

0.01

8

248364

511374

5682002

98.43

0.09

0.43

0.36

<0.01

0.16

<0.01

<5

The Southeast Zone, comprising 29 high-grade quartzite outcrop seize samples, returned a mean of 98.52% SiO₂ with values starting from 95.82% to 99.82% SiO₂. Common values for different constituents have been: 0.35% Fe₂O₃, 0.07% CaO, 0.30% Al₂O₃, 0.06% MgO, 0.02% TiO₂, <0.01% P₂O₅, and 26ppm boron. See Determine 4 and Desk 3.*

Determine 4. Southeast Zone Outcrop Sampling – %SiO2

Desk 3. Southeast Zone Outcrop Samples – %SiO2

Pattern #

Easting (m)

Northing (m)

SiO2 (%)

Al2O3 (%)

CaO (%)

Fe2O3 (%)

MgO (%)

P2O5 (%)

TiO2 (%)

B (ppm)

248384

513642

5680350

98.22

0.37

0.21

0.41

0.14

0.02

0.03

27

248385

513671

5680320

95.82

0.57

0.69

0.51

0.52

0.02

0.03

30

248386

513685

5680313

97.77

0.48

0.05

0.37

0.05

0.01

0.03

30

248387

513708

5680285

98.90

0.36

0.02

0.35

0.04

<0.01

0.03

30

248388

513735

5680261

98.11

0.32

0.03

0.31

0.04

<0.01

0.03

35

248389

513748

5680244

98.05

0.49

0.03

0.30

0.03

<0.01

0.01

28

248390

513654

5680223

98.91

0.13

0.01

0.27

0.04

<0.01

0.01

29

248391

513627

5680208

98.74

0.09

0.02

0.30

0.02

<0.01

0.02

27

248392

513600

5680217

99.52

0.06

0.02

0.32

0.03

<0.01

0.01

23

248393

513564

5680220

96.98

1.04

0.05

0.33

0.07

0.03

0.07

41

248394

513592

5680259

98.91

0.30

0.13

0.35

0.13

<0.01

0.02

31

248395

513390

5680466

99.26

0.11

0.02

0.35

0.03

<0.01

0.01

25

248396

513367

5680495

98.81

0.12

0.07

0.34

0.04

<0.01

0.01

25

248397

513332

5680531

99.25

0.08

0.02

0.37

0.01

<0.01

0.01

26

248398

513301

5680539

99.08

0.15

0.21

0.33

0.04

<0.01

0.01

27

248399

513283

5680559

98.76

0.07

0.09

0.36

0.02

<0.01

0.01

22

248400

513263

5680602

98.77

0.08

0.01

0.29

<0.01

<0.01

0.01

24

299501

513231

5680636

98.14

0.15

0.02

0.41

0.02

<0.01

0.01

26

299502

513188

5680660

99.05

0.20

0.02

0.27

<0.01

<0.01

0.01

27

299503

513160

5680700

99.07

0.16

0.02

0.31

0.02

<0.01

0.01

27

299504

513133

5680705

98.85

0.13

0.02

0.26

0.01

<0.01

0.01

26

299508

513834

5679986

98.68

0.15

0.03

0.26

0.02

<0.01

0.01

21

299509

513876

5679941

98.88

0.23

0.03

0.27

0.04

<0.01

0.03

34

299510

513904

5679907

99.08

0.05

0.02

0.29

<0.01

<0.01

0.01

11

299511

513968

5679864

99.82

0.15

0.02

0.27

0.02

<0.01

0.01

23

299512

514023

5679832

99.21

0.12

0.02

0.29

0.03

<0.01

0.03

10

299513

514070

5679980

97.08

1.11

0.02

0.75

0.09

0.01

0.05

18

299514

514081

5680011

96.66

1.27

0.02

0.43

0.05

0.01

0.07

26

299515

514075

5680039

98.58

0.26

0.07

0.45

0.07

0.01

0.03

14

The rest of samples have been both taken close to the contacts of the adjoining models or from non-quartzite outcrops of the adjoining Glenogle shale (east contact) and Beaverfoot dolomite (west contact) and weren’t included within the statistical abstract of the quartzite samples taken.

Channel Sampling Outcomes
Channel sampling was performed on the Desk Mountain Zone, with outcomes constantly just like the outcrop sampling outcomes. Sampling process consisted of steady chip sampling alongside a 3-centimetre lower channel. Samples have been taken repeatedly over 1-metre intervals perpendicular to the strike orientation of the outcrop, with the pattern sequence ranging from the southwest finish of the channel. Intervals shorter than 20 centimetres have been mixed with the earlier interval. 66 steady chip channel samples have been collected over 62.11 metres inside 74.16 metres in 5 channels, returning a weighted common of 98.86% SiOâ‚‚.

4 further duplicates have been taken as QA/QC checks and handed validation. Pattern density is enough to point the correct illustration of the underlying mineralization.

See Determine 5 and Desk 4 under.

Determine 5. Channel Sampling Places – Desk Mountain Zone

Desk 4. Desk Mountain Zone – Channel Sampling

Channel

From (m)

To (m)

Interval (m)

SiO2 (%)

Al2O3 (%)

CaO (%)

Fe2O3 (%)

MgO (%)

P2O5 (%)

TiO2 (%)

B (ppm)

TM1

0.00

4.74

4.74

98.83

0.15

0.01

0.30

0.01

0.01

0.01

24

TM2

0.00

5.80

5.80

98.88

0.10

0.01

0.33

0.01

0.01

0.01

10

5.80

6.30

0.50

Overburden

6.30

8.83

2.53

98.90

0.10

0.01

0.30

0.01

0.01

0.02

7

8.83

9.38

0.55

Overburden

9.38

13.0

3.62

99.21

0.09

<0.01

0.35

0.01

0.01

0.02

11

TM3

0.00

7.60

7.60

99.03

0.11

<0.01

0.32

0.01

0.01

0.02

7

7.60

10.20

2.60

Overburden

10.20

11.00

0.80

99.08

0.11

<0.01

0.27

0.01

0.01

0.02

6

11.00

11.90

0.90

Overburden

11.90

18.00

6.10

98.79

0.11

<0.01

0.29

<0.01

0.01

0.02

10

TM4

0.00

5.22

5.22

99.09

0.09

<0.01

0.33

<0.01

0.01

0.02

12

TM5

0.00

3.80

3.80

98.82

0.15

<0.01

0.29

<0.01

0.01

0.04

15

3.80

4.50

0.70

Overburden

4.50

7.00

2.50

98.85

0.12

<0.01

0.31

0.02

0.01

0.02

20

7.00

10.20

3.20

Overburden

10.20

12.00

1.80

98.77

0.09

<0.01

0.34

0.01

<0.01

0.01

12

12.00

13.00

1.00

Overburden

13.00

17.50

4.50

98.30

0.15

0.09

0.34

0.02

<0.01

0.01

13

17.50

20.10

2.60

Overburden

20.10

33.20

13.10

98.81

0.11

<0.01

0.31

0.01

<0.01

0.01

9

Dialogue
Sampling outcomes inside the zones have been constantly excessive purity, with the northern Desk Mountain Zone returning the most effective and most constant grades. The beneficial grades replicate discipline observations of a broad zone of white quartzite measuring not less than 150 metres extensive and a strike size extending from the Trans-Canada Freeway to the south and to the north, past the northern finish of the Property, representing a complete strike size of not less than 4 kilometres. Though the western cliff face of Desk Mountain clearly demarcates the western margin of the Mount Wilson Formation quartzite, the japanese margin is obscured by a deep boulder discipline originating from the intensive, steep quartzite publicity on this space.

Channels sampling outcomes demonstrated a consistency in grade over a large space inside the Desk Mountain Zone.

All samples have been submitted to ALS Laboratories in North Vancouver, British Columbia for B-MS82L (boron) and ME-XRF26 (all different components). 4 pattern duplicates have been taken within the channel sampling sequence, and handed QA/QC.

* Cautionary Word

The reader is cautioned that seize samples are selective by nature and should not characterize the true grade or type of mineralization throughout the property.

In regards to the Desk Mountain Challenge
The Desk Mountain Silica Challenge contains 2,304 hectares positioned 4 kilometres east of Golden, B.C., with glorious year-round entry and proximity to the Canadian Pacific Railway Golden Rail Yard. The property hosts as much as 10 kilometers of regionally mapped strike size of the Mount Wilson Formation, with obvious widths starting from 300 to 1,400 metres at floor. The undertaking is strategically positioned close to each the Moberly Silica Mine and Sinova Quartz silica quarry, which exhibit financial grade silica better than 99.6% SiOâ‚‚ purity.

Certified Particular person
Technical info on this information launch has been reviewed and accepted by Case Lewis, P.Geo., a “Certified Particular person” as outlined below NI 43-101 Requirements of Disclosure for Mineral Initiatives and a director of the Desk Mountain Challenge vendor.

About Troy Minerals
Troy Minerals is a Canadian based mostly publicly listed mining firm centered on constructing shareholder worth by acquisition, exploration, and growth of strategically positioned “vital” mineral belongings. Troy is aggressively advancing its initiatives inside the silica (silicon), vanadium, and uncommon earths industries inside areas that exhibit excessive and rising demand for such commodities, in each North America and Central-East Asia. The Firm’s main goal is the near-term prospect of manufacturing with a imaginative and prescient of changing into a cash-flowing mining firm to in the end ship tangible financial worth to shareholders, state, and native communities.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD,
Rana Vig | CEO & Director Phone: 604-218-4766
Electronic mail: rana@ranavig.com

Ahead-Wanting Statements
Assertion Concerning Ahead-Wanting Data: This launch contains sure statements which may be deemed “forward-looking statements”. All statements on this launch, aside from statements of historic info, that tackle occasions or developments that Troy Assets Inc. (the “Firm”) expects to happen, are forward-looking statements. Ahead-looking statements are statements that aren’t historic info and are usually, however not at all times, recognized by the phrases “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “intends”, “estimates”, “initiatives”, “potential” and comparable expressions, or that occasions or situations “will”, “would”, “might”, “may” or “ought to” happen. Though the Firm believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based mostly on cheap assumptions, such statements should not ensures of future efficiency and precise outcomes might differ materially from these within the forward-looking statements. Components that might trigger the precise outcomes to vary materially from these in forward-looking statements embrace outcomes of exploration actions might not present high quality and amount mandatory for additional exploration or future exploitation of minerals deposits, volatility of commodity costs, and continued availability of capital and financing, allowing and different approvals, and normal financial, market or enterprise situations. Traders are cautioned that any such statements should not ensures of future efficiency and precise outcomes or developments might differ materially from these projected within the forward-looking statements. Ahead-looking statements are based mostly on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Firm’s administration on the date the statements are made. Besides as required by relevant securities legal guidelines, the Firm undertakes no obligation to replace these forward-looking statements within the occasion that administration’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or different elements, ought to change.

The Canadian Securities Change has not reviewed this press launch and doesn’t settle for duty for the adequacy or accuracy of this information launch.

Click on right here to attach with Troy Minerals (CSE:TROY;OTCQB:TROYF;FSE:VJ3) to obtain an Investor Presentation

Supply



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles