As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face rising complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in belongings (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement belongings, DC plans carry vital accountability for guaranteeing robust monetary outcomes for contributors​1. In 2025, plan sponsors should concentrate on optimizing funding methods, lowering prices, and enhancing participant schooling to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embody essential areas equivalent to goal date fund choice, price transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation developments.
Focusing on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steerage, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Ideas for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines finest practices for TDF choice2. Key takeaways embody:
- Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic evaluate
- Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
- Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
- Profiting from all obtainable data within the evaluate and decision-making course of
- Documenting the method
- Creating efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steerage are three key factors to think about. First, as with every funding course of, you will need to perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of workers make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by amassing workforce demographics, funding behavioral developments — generally present in stories produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce information. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s targets for the plan and total funding beliefs that can function a information when evaluating varied TDFs. Making prudent funding selections requires these parts to drive the evaluation and determine TDFs which are appropriate to your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Courses
We frequently see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes by means of the trouble of discovering a terrific funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding automobile.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor would possibly choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio contains revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score towards its charges, fairly than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different instances, a plan is perhaps eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) automobile with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Usually, these decisions or oversights lead to plan contributors paying greater funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding automobile.
We advise plan sponsors contemplate the affect on contributors of their present mutual fund share lessons, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for identical CIT technique. We suggest plan sponsors use zero-revenue share lessons of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply higher price transparency and sometimes decrease total charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share lessons.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding evaluations comply with the same format: a have a look at the financial system and capital markets adopted by a evaluate of the efficiency and danger metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of alternative, modifications are mentioned. Whereas routine evaluations of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we advise supplementing with a periodic evaluate of the funding lineup construction, which means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re carried out with energetic administration or passive administration. We advise the sort of evaluate at the very least each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant means.
Determine 1: Basic Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To guage the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the prevailing funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is suitable or whether or not funding classes must be altered. Elements for the dialogue may embody participant group funding data, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Schooling Sources
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Examine, workers reported spending at the very least three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that staff’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
We now have seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages will help workers enhance their monetary well being and scale back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a big position — significantly for workforces the place a big proportion of the inhabitants is just not at a desk – there’s a significant enhance within the variety of plan sponsors and their workers on the lookout for individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These non-public conferences allow workers to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Analyzing Committee Construction and Tasks
Employment developments from “the nice resignation” to “the massive keep” and “the nice reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of at this time’s workforce. These modifications additionally negatively affect an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes would possibly differ from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
- Doc the committee construction and tasks
- Construct an onboarding schooling guidelines for brand new committee members
- Preserve a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with schooling
- Verify the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, govt summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Developments in Litigation and Regulation
With vital provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there may be the potential for brand new tax laws. Modifications to tax-advantaged retirement applications can include tax laws, so it is going to be vital for plan sponsors to remain present on potential modifications.
From a litigation standpoint, two main developments formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture belongings.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary obligation to observe plan bills in order that they’re cheap for the companies supplied? It is very important notice that this matter covers each vendor bills, equivalent to recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, equivalent to selection of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation relating to utilization of forfeiture belongings is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has centered on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture belongings to cut back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on prime of those and different developments in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal position in shaping the monetary way forward for hundreds of thousands of workers. By prioritizing funding optimization, value effectivity, governance, and participant schooling, they will improve retirement outcomes and scale back fiduciary dangers. As market circumstances, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making will likely be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant affect in 2025 and past​.
Disclosures
The fabric offered herein is of a basic nature and doesn’t represent the supply by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any particular person, or a advice to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such data is just not assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to alter with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising title PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the varied discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated companies supplied by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions performed by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation until, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax companies settlement. PNC Financial institution is just not registered as a municipal advisor underneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Road Reform and Client Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
